Connect with us

Published

on

[ad_1]

Late Monday, President Trump announced Attorney General William Barr’s resignation, effective Dec. 23, 2020. The announcement followed a deluge of criticism from Trump supporters about Barr’s handling of the investigation into Crossfire Hurricane and the Department of Justice’s silence about the investigation into Hunter Biden.

But Barr’s resignation letter, posted by Trump on Twitter, demonstrates the attorney general ended his service to the president and our country with the same dedication and integrity that he showcased over the last year. During that time, Barr faced the daunting task of investigating Crossfire Hurricane’s targeting of the Trump campaign, then Trump transition team and Trump administration—the second-worst political scandal in American history, surpassed only by Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s fraudulent investigation into the Trump team and supposed Russia collusion.

But you don’t return our great country to the rule of law by replicating the left’s abuse of power. And you don’t right the scales of justice with revenge. Yet, with Joe Biden maintaining his hold on the Electoral College votes necessary to oust Trump, some conservatives and many Trump supporters are demanding both and wrongly condemning Barr for delivering neither.

Justice Needs to Be Untainted by Politics

The attacks on Barr from some on the right hit two points: Barr failed in his promises to get to the bottom of the Spygate scandal and kept mum about the FBI’s investigation into Hunter Biden. Had Barr acted on both—or either—fronts before Nov. 3, 2020, Trump would have sailed to reelection, critics of the attorney general argue.

Barr’s job, however, was not to get Trump re-elected. His job as the top law enforcement officer of the country is to ensure that the laws are equally and fairly applied and that the Department of Justice seeks justice—without favor and without prejudice.

Sometimes the path to justice is a long and arduous one. Such is the case in the unraveling of the Spygate scandal. If we truly want justice for Trump and the other innocents swept up in the scandal, and if we truly want to ensure that never again will the intelligence and law enforcement communities target a political enemy, all the threads of complicity must be carefully unraveled, both to obtain the truth and to develop an unbreakable legal case against the guilty.

Those faulting Barr for failing to move more quickly expose naivety about the complexities of the case: Spygate involved not merely a few rogue actors but flowed from the complicity or willful neglect of many high-level officials in multiple agencies, as well as the vast majority of Mueller’s team.

Confidential human sources, such as Stephan Halper; private actors, such as Christopher Steele and Glenn Simpson; and entities such as Fusion GPS, the Democratic National Committee, and corporate media outlets on the receiving end of illegal leaks all played a part in the scandal. Spygate’s tentacles also reached international allies and foes alike, including England, Italy, Greece, Australia, and Russia, implicating both national security concerns and America’s delicate relationship with other governments.

So, yes, the investigation has dragged on, but with good reason, beyond the unexpected delays caused by COVID. Yet Barr’s critics pooh pooh the reasons for the delay and posit that the lack of a more concrete comeuppance to date is damning of Barr.

Barr Is Neither a Trump Hack nor Anti-Trump Hack

Roger Simon took that tack in “The Tragic Failure of William Barr,” but rather than exposing a blot on Barr’s character, the article reflects poorly on Simon and The Epoch Times that published the article: Not content with complaining about the delays, Simon suggests the pandemic served as put a pretext to slow-walk the investigation. Why? Maybe because Barr was “too angry at Donald Trump for meddling in his affairs,” Simon suggests.

The rhetorical innuendos peppered throughout the article cannot withstand scrutiny. Since his confirmation as attorney general, Barr has proven himself driven by one thing only: justice. Barr spoke out where appropriate, such as during hearings on Capitol Hill; he called spying “spying”; and he expanded the investigations when merited.

Announcements also came when needed, such as following the release of the inspector general’s report, when Barr publicly expressed disagreement with Michael Horowitz’s conclusion that Crossfire Hurricane was properly predicated.

Additionally, Barr’s team released evidence to Sidney Powell that had been improperly withheld from her client, retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn. Of note, these releases came before U.S. Attorney Jeff Jensen completed his investigation, and before the DOJ filed a motion to dismiss the Flynn case, demonstrating the attorney general went public when justice required the early release of information. In the Flynn case, that meant providing Flynn’s legal team the relevant evidence before additional proceedings might occur.

Barr also spoke publicly about some of this evidence to counter the false narrative pushed by some of the wrongdoers, such as since-fired FBI Director James Comey. In an interview with Mark Levin, Barr noted that the evidence discovered by Jensen “showed clearly that the FBI agents who interviewed Flynn did not think he was lying.”

He added, “This was later minimized in testimony as suggesting ‘Well, they meant he didn’t break out into sweat and his eye pupils didn’t contract, that’s all they were saying.’” “No,” Barr stressed, “They were saying he didn’t believe he thought he was lying at the time.”

The DOJ continued to release more evidence to Powell as Jensen’s investigation continued, including a summary of the interview of FBI Agent William Barnett, who told Jensen that “the Special Counsel Office pursued Flynn simply as a means to ‘get Trump.’” Barnett’s full statement holds implications much beyond the Flynn case, but there is no legitimate reason to release additional details at this point.

We know this because Barr has shown that when a case is ready, the evidence is forthcoming. Such was the case with the handling of the criminal case against Kevin Clinesmith, an attorney in the FBI’s Office of General Counsel.

On a Need-to-Know Basis in Service of Justice

In August, once the DOJ obtained a plea agreement with Clinesmith for his crime of altering an email to obtain a renewal of the court surveillance order on Carter Page, the plea was made public. Surely Barr’s team had evidence of this crime long before, but no valid purpose would be served by its release prior to the filing of an indictment, or here the plea agreement.

Likewise, the country had no need to know that Barr had named Durham a special counsel in October, and by withholding this news, Barr ensured it could not inappropriately affect the presidential election. Once voting ended, Barr let America know of Durham’s status. The timing of the appointment proved Barr acted not from vindictiveness but from a desire to guarantee the investigation continued to its natural conclusion.

Barr also had no valid reason to release information about the investigation into Hunter Biden. And those condemning Barr for remaining mum while the press buried the story that would have buried Biden fail to see that they are demanding of Barr what they condemned in the Obama-Biden administration.

The rule of law must not bend to the benefit of anyone. Barr knows this, and has withstood serial attempts to force his ouster, either temporarily via recusal or permanently by calls for his resignation or impeachment. Barr is neither coward nor has moderated his response, and for that he deserves our respect.

Likewise, Barr’s refusal to tolerate leaks, politicize the Hunter Biden investigation, or make an imprudent rush of the SpyGate probe is worthy of praise from both sides of the aisle. Given the left and corporate media’s performance over the last four years, their silence does not surprise me. I am surprised and saddened, however, by the cacophony of complaints from those clamoring for a return to the rule of law.

Barr has given that to us over the last year, but it seems that is not what some on the right wanted after all. Well, if they wanted Barr’s ouster, they now have it. But Barr’s resignation will right no wrongs. His legacy, though, in a return to the rule of law, will—along with Durham’s continuing special counsel investigation.

Margot Cleveland is a senior contributor to The Federalist. Cleveland served nearly 25 years as a permanent law clerk to a federal appellate judge and is a former full-time faculty member and adjunct instructor at the college of business at the University of Notre Dame.
The views expressed here are those of Cleveland in her private capacity.



[ad_2]

Advertisement
Comments

Politics

Trump calls Limbaugh ‘legend,’ in first TV interview since Senate trial

Published

on

Former President Trump on Wednesday afternoon praised the career of conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh, who has died of cancer.

“He loved his country, and he loved his fans,” Trump said on the Fox News Channel. “He is a legend.”

The interview was Trump’s first since the conclusion of his Senate impeachment trial last week.

Limbaugh’s wife, Kathryn, announced her husband’s death earlier in the day on his radio show. He had been diagnosed about a year ago with Stage-IV lung cancer. He was 70.

The president also said he had a personal friendship with Limbaugh, who was an early supporter of his 2016 presidential bid and who, like Trump, thought the president won reelection in 2020.

Advertisement

Trump also pointed out that Limbaugh was a provocateur in his views about conservative politics that often sparked backlash from liberals and other critics. 

Trump last year in his State of the Union address awarded Limbaugh the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

Continue Reading

Politics

Rep. Bennie Thompson targets Trump, Giuliani, Proud Boys and Oath Keepers in Capitol riot lawsuit

Published

on

Rep. Bennie Thompson is targeting former President Donald Trump, Rudy Giuliani, the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers in a suit alleging that they conspired to incite the violence that transpired at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6.

The lawsuit filed on behalf of the long-serving Mississippi Democrat by the NAACP and the Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll law firm claims that the defendants broke the 1871 Ku Klux Klan Act by attempting to meddle in Congress’s certification of the Electoral College count, according to NPR.

“The insurrection at the Capitol was a direct, intended, and foreseeable result of the Defendants’ unlawful conspiracy,” the lawsuit claims. “It was instigated according to a common plan that the Defendants pursued since the election held in November 2020.”

According to the outlet, Thompson told reporters on Tuesday: “I am privileged to partner with the NAACP to have my day in court so that the perpetrators of putting members of Congress at risk can be held accountable.”

Advertisement

Trump was acquitted on Saturday in his Senate impeachment trial in a 57-43 vote. While a majority of senators voted that the former commander-in-chief was guilty regarding the single article of impeachment that was passed by the House last month during Trump’s waning days in office, the 57 guilty votes failed to clear the two-thirds supermajority required to secure a conviction.

Continue Reading

Politics

Judicial Watch sues U.S. Capitol Police in pursuit of emails and videos pertaining to Jan. 6 riots

Published

on

Judicial Watch has lodged a lawsuit against the U.S. Capitol Police in an effort to obtain emails and videos pertaining to the riot that transpired Jan. 6 at the Capitol.

The watchdog organization said in a press release that it filed the suit under the common law right of access to public records following the Capitol Police declining to provide materials sought in a Jan. 21 request.

“The public has a right to know about how Congress handled security and what all the videos show of the US Capitol riot,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a statement. “What are Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer trying to hide from the American people?”

The January request sought all video from within the U.S. Capitol during a nine-hour period on Jan. 6.

The request also sought “Email communications between the U.S. Capitol Police Executive Team and the Capitol Police Board concerning the security of the Capitol on January 6, 2021. The timeframe of this request is from January 1, 2021 through January 10, 2021,” according to Judicial Watch. The request also sought, “Email communications of the Capitol Police Board with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U.S. Department of Justice, and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security concerning the security of the Capitol on January 6, 2021. The timeframe of this request is from January 1, 2021 through January 10, 2021,” according to the watchdog group.

Advertisement

The Capitol Police said in a Feb. 11 letter that the materials sought do not constitute “public records,” according to Judicial Watch.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
News5 hours ago

Seven shot in Philadelphia near SEPTA station, according to police

Politics5 hours ago

Trump calls Limbaugh ‘legend,’ in first TV interview since Senate trial

News1 day ago

CNN’s Stelter,’ ‘Saturday Night Live’ this weekend didn’t mention Cuomo’s nursing home COVID story

Politics1 day ago

Rep. Bennie Thompson targets Trump, Giuliani, Proud Boys and Oath Keepers in Capitol riot lawsuit

Donald Trump1 day ago

Trump unleashes scathing statement blasting Sen. Mitch McConnell

Politics1 day ago

Judicial Watch sues U.S. Capitol Police in pursuit of emails and videos pertaining to Jan. 6 riots

Bannon2 days ago

Bannon — ‘Trump may run for Congress in 2022 and lead impeachment against Biden’…

Donald Trump4 days ago

Trump acquitted in impeachment trial; 7 GOP Senators vote with Democrats to convict

Candace Owens5 days ago

Candace Owens post photo of her son with a message to all young feminist.

COVID-!95 days ago

Biden administration to allow 25,000 asylum-seekers to cross US-Mexico border while cases are pending

Electoral College5 days ago

Yellen Reportedly Looking to Name Climate ‘Czar’ at Treasury

Donald Trump5 days ago

New details about Trump-McCarthy shouting match show Trump refused to call off the rioters

Hillary Clinton5 days ago

Final Showdown: Hillary vs Trump

President Joe Biden5 days ago

Biden team leaks Trump’s private health information (Covid) to the New York Times…

Banned Video6 days ago

Censored Dr. Goes Off On Lying Fauci, CDC and NIH

Clinton2 months ago

BREAKING Whistleblower: Drops HARD Evidence, Biden, Obama, Hillary EXECUTED Seal Team 6, Audio Proof

DOJ2 weeks ago

Sidney Powell | How to Fix Justice

Banned Video6 days ago

Censored Dr. Goes Off On Lying Fauci, CDC and NIH

Rep Marjorie Taylor Greene2 weeks ago

2019 video shows Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene telling people to flood the Capitol

Mike Bloomberg2 weeks ago

[VIDEO] Uh Oh, Now Mike Bloomberg is Going After Joe Biden

Clinton2 months ago

Breaking: Patrick Byrne says he set Hillary Clinton up in a FBI sting in January 2016 for a 18 million dollar bribe

Impeachment2 weeks ago

Breaking — President Trump’s Formal Written Response to Article of Impeachment…

Nancy Pelosi3 weeks ago

Nancy Pelosi’s long history of getting rich from shady Wall Street deals…

Candace Owens5 days ago

Candace Owens post photo of her son with a message to all young feminist.

Donald Trump2 weeks ago

Trump calls Marjorie Taylor Greene… ‘I will never back down!’

Politics1 month ago

Romney Gets Confronted At Utah Airport, Passengers Chant ‘Traitor’ After He Boards The Plane

William Barr2 months ago

Video: Facts Matter (Dec.15): The Real Reason That Barr ‘Resigned’

President Health3 weeks ago

Biden did not look healthy in a brief appearance from the Oval Office today

Alexandria Ocasio Smollett2 weeks ago

Photos of AOC and the staged protest in front of fence in which she falsely claimed children were inside, being held in cages

Election 20201 month ago

What did Pelosi know about January 6th attack?…

Facebook

Facebook

Trending

Copyright © 2021 By TSD